Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Washington Alumni Association (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 03:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

University of Washington Alumni Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't want to say that no alumni association can be notable, but I see no evidence that this one is. The contents would be of no interest to anyone who is not a member or prospective member, and therefore not suited to an encyclopedia. The way it's written seems to indicate it is copied from various parts of their site. DGG ( talk ) 20:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete No evidence of independent notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as questionably independently notable or merge to the university's article at best as this is unlikely to be solidly independently notable from the university. Notifying the only still active AfDers Carrite, Namiba and Stuartyeates. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trim to two paras and a link to their home page and merge and redirect to Category:University of Washington alumni. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect per Staszek Lem--TM 00:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mergeany cited, non-promotional encyclopedic information and redirect to University of Washington. No evidence of notability. --Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 18:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is just a standard aspect of being an operational university with any sense. No evidence that there's anything notable about this association as opposed to any other. Blythwood (talk) 22:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.