Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpBuild

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 21:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UpBuild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Only mentions in sources are in passing, and there is no substantive coverage by reliable, third-party sources. A good number of the sources listed are self-published the company or people affiliated with the company. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: An article on a recent new web marketing firm, supported by routine announcements, primary sources, and inclusion in non-notable lists. These confirm that it is a firm going about its business, but there is no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not pass WP:NCORP, lack of significant coverage of reliable sources that are independent of the topic. The editor whose username is Z0 08:47, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.