Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upperstall.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Upperstall.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage from independent reliable sources. The Time magazine citation in the article is a passing mention of an insignificant distinction ("honorable mention" among author Richard Corliss's favorite movie sites of 2004). I wasn't able to find better sources outside of the article. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - One source from 14 years ago does not point to notability. Unless more recent sources are found this is not a notable site. Playlet (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.