Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uprok Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uprok Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Source searches are only providing passing mentions and name checks. Could be redirected to Tooth & Nail Records. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content can be moved/merged to Tooth & Nail Records in Structure and Label artists sections. Lefton4ya (talk) 17:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with nom. Notability is not inherited, no indication of notability is its own right, no references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.
• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 22:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.