Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upward communication

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upward communication

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources. -- Beland (talk) 09:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 09:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. no sources, WP:GNG not met. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A search reveals this is a concept with a long-standing history in business and management theory, dating back to at least the 1960s. I will add some sources to the article.JohnmgKing (talk) 14:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or at least Draftify. As currently written, the article is facile and includes speculation, "This type of communication is becoming more popular." Of course, any organization has upward communication, downward communication, and lateral communication. Rhadow (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The sources JohnmgKing have added to the article demonstrate that this concept meets WP:GNG. It certainly needs improvement, but that is not a reason to delete it. WJ94 (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the journal articles added, now at GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.