Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete/speedy delete per WP:G11, as the article is very promotional. This should also be seen as a WP:SNOW delete, as I can't see that this would end any other way if the AfD lasted for another 4-5 days. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Reader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vehemently non-notable. @Crystallizedcarbon: who originally PRODed Colin Schälli. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Page is completed unsourced, reads like a puff piece, and lacks coverage in RS. Meatsgains (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NBOOK and our general notability guidelines I searched for sources, but I could not find any meaningful coverage from reliable sources.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Completely non-notable chest-thumping ("...worldly wisdoms with the intention to make people think"). sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 05:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.