Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Use of Pen Names by Female Writers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect is a separate editorial decision, if anybody cares to. Sandstein 15:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Pen Names by Female Writers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTESSAY Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pen_name#Female_authors where the topic is already adequately covered (I was actually in the process of doing just that but hit an edit conflict with the nominator). Alternatively, delete if this is deemed to be an implausible redirect title. --Finngall ^talk 20:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- The topic is already covered at Pen_name#Female_authors. This article is unsourced and fails WP:ESSAY, so none of this content can be merged there, and I do not believe it is a particularly plausible redirect title because of its length. Reyk _YO! 08:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or possibly redirect to Pen_name#Female authors. The title is of questionable usefulness as a redirect, but I'm not dead set against it. The subject does seem to be covered rather well at the previously mentioned article, and we don't need an essay that duplicates it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.