Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ustaad Surendra Narayan Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ustaad Surendra Narayan Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unsourced biography created by a WP:SPA. The article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. An internet search reveals no reliable sources, none of which can even support the information presented in the article. As such, it is probably a WP:COI as well. BenLinus1214^talk 00:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom. non-notable. – nafSadh did say 20:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non notable bloke, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly COI, the user who made this article mentions himself near the end. Unless some reliable sources are added, I would say delete it. Jcmcc450 (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-Per nom Wgolf (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.