Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utility Connect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (A7, G11). (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 08:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Utility Connect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company lacking coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possible CSD A7: The extent of independent coverage provided for this firm is a name-check in a brief article whose focus is another firm, and my searches are finding nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability. The only WP:RS in the article (and that I can find) is trivial coverage. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.