Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vênus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vênus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years and never been updated. Refs are really poor. No social media or streaming coverage. Potentially notable right enough. scope_creep^Talk 21:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails notability per nom, though I think this should've been prodded first. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clearly fails WP:GNG, although I am in agreement with Aaron Liu that this should have gone to PROD. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 08:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails GNGGNG and WP:NBAND. Source eval:

BEFORE showed promo but nothing that meets SIGCOV. There is a substantial amount of unsourced content about BLPs in the article, if kept this needs to be removed.  // Timothy :: talk  20:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.