Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VA Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as a blatant advertisement, so badly written and so badly sourced that even if it could be salvaged as notable under WP:CORPDEPTH it would still require a complete top-to-bottom rewrite of the whole thing. WP:SALT applied as well, due to the multiple creations at another title. If creator is really that determined to get an article into Wikipedia, they can submit it in draftspace. Bearcat (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VA Sound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:CORPDEPTH. Unsourced. Kleuske (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. — fortunavelut luna 11:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG, and recreation of VASOUNDLLC, which is already blocked from creation. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 17:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Probably could go speedy as there are no sources available through search. I find the VasoundLLC website and a few YouTube references but nothing else. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.