Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VMmanager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

VMmanager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Absolutely no coverage from reliable sources. — Newslinger talk 19:57, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 19:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 19:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 19:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 19:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Neutral - First clue is the likes at alternativeTo : 66, which is more than any other, and much more than most.
  I also found:
   : https://www.hostingadvice.com/blog/best-virtual-machine-management-panels/
   : https://www.tecmint.com/opensource-commercial-control-panels-manage-virtual-machines/
  I don't think the problem is notability, but more interest-ability.
   : Hypervisors is not known & understood by many, and as far as Wikipedia goes - well, look at the sorry state of the article for WMware's vSphere.
  -- DexterPointy (talk) 20:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Struck content above per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• None of these are reliable sources. AlternativeTo is user-generated content, the first blog is in Wikipedia's spam blacklist, and the second blog offers a listicle with no significant coverage of the article subject. — Newslinger talk 22:55, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting to use any of those as a source for article content, I'm merely entertaining the idea that some notability to WMmanager exist. -- DexterPointy (talk) 07:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Unfortunately, those sources wouldn't prove the product's notability, since WP:GNG requires significant coverage from reliable sources. The non-blacklisted sites could be used to support the article content (when better sources aren't available), but they won't do much in this AfD discussion because they're not reliable sources. — Newslinger talk 08:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I've changed my vote to "Neutral". -- DexterPointy (talk) 09:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Struck content above per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Got a bunch of scholar hits, but they're not talking about this particular piece of software (rather they're just using camel case to refer to a generic class, but that's beside the point). The search results are further confused by the existence of an "Oracle VMManager". One passing mention in "searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com" and no other sources lead me to conclude the software isn't notable. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:48, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No apparent coverage in sources other than the usual man pages and marketing. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.