Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VR't Ventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

VR't Ventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources provided do not meet WP:NCORP and I wasn't able to find anything better online. Virtually all coverage in RS is of exhibitions that VR't Ventures has been involved with, with barely more than a sentence devoted to covering the company. Other provided sources include interviews with key members of the company and a TechCrunch article that devotes a paragraph of coverage in a wider article about VR applications. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Coverage is far too minimal to pass even WP:GNG, much less WP:CORPDEPTH at this point. The Forbes article is better than nothing, but otherwise, I didn't find any good articles to bring back to the table. 66.198.222.67 (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fundamentall an advertisement. In combination with minimal notability , that;s a god reason for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 11:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, agree with above editors, one of the article's references says it all - "The young LA-based company, VRt Ventures, ...", so it may also be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.