Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasilitsa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The "maybe keep" !vote comes across as a possibility for article retention, but the "maybe" part can also mean "possibly, but not certainly" (see a definition of "maybe"). The overall discussion herein doesn't quite convince me to close this with a keep result, which could be considered by some based upon an !vote count, but discussion closures are not based upon an !vote count. Then there's also the matter of very limited participation that has occurred herein after two full relistings. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vasilitsa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are several things to say, one is that the other Wikis show nothing actually convincing to suggest this can be improved because of those, another is that my searches have simply found nothing better than 3 links part of a "travel guide" at News thus not actual solid coverage and also the current article simply suggests it's a local ski resort, nothing particularly outstanding; so unless better Greek sources can be found, which I'm somewhat skeptical, the notability is still currently questionable. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. The ski resort does not look notable, at least for a standalone article, but the mountain of the same name that the ski resort is on looks likely to be notable as a natural feature per WP:GEOLAND. The ski resort could probably justify a non-promotional section (of probably only a fairly short paragraph) within an article on the mountain. Though WP:TNT is an option - a straight translation of the Greek article on the mountain would be distinctly better than what we have here at the moment and would probably not reuse any content from the current article. PWilkinson (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

d:Q3659498 d:Q12274909

• Maybe keep - looks like it needs to be WP:TNT'd and then rebuilt from parts of the Greek article. Tom29739 ^[talk] 22:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.