Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vereniging Stop AWACS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 07:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vereniging Stop AWACS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and WP:NPOV. Issues mentioned in the 2008 AFD were never corrected, and the articles reads as if written by a COI/paid editor/both. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 06:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, Aviation, and Netherlands. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: At the time of the aforementioned 2008 AfD, the article was titled "Vereniging STOP awacs", and the original nomination was titled accordingly. (The usual process for detecting previous nominations does not automatically pick up on this subtle difference.) No opinion on the article itself. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, written like an ad/essay, hard to expand, not Notable, this article is full of issues, i cannot think of a reason to keep this article. -I.R.B.A.T^{(yell at me) (The IRBAT Files)} 12:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no notable pressure group. As well as WP:N, this article fails WP:SOAPBOX. Jdcooper (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.