Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verulam Secondary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verulam Secondary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unsourced article was prodded in March 2023, but the prod was (in my view wrongly) removed. Disclaimer: I removed the unsourced material in the article before nominating it. I hadn't planned on nominating it at that point, but I won't restore it, either. Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 1 line unreferenced article that fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 10:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. No appropriate list or article for redirection either. MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.