Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibhinta Verma (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This article was also eligible for CSD G5. MER-C 10:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vibhinta Verma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the reference is mainly kind of WP:NEWSEVENT , one time statement and does not meet the WP:GNG criteria too.Shrikanthv (talk) 05:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Shrikanthv (talk) 05:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The article was deleted at AfD a year ago by User:J04n; if this version is mostly the same, it can be deleted per WP:CSD#G4. ansh666 05:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Now she is also a film actress worked in Station: The Film Artistlover90 (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet of User:Sibtain 007. MER-C 10:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Currently the sources were from multiple high standard Indian newspapers and since she was associated with Indian films (Bollywood or something), I think she is notable enough. Jim Carter ⁽^talk⁾ 12:30, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nominator. Jim Carter ^(talk) 01:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Jim note that the actual newpapers talks about the releasing movie and does not really talk about notability of the person, please also note that it seriously fails WP:ENT, and the news paper links it mentions about increase in business of image consulting no where talks about how notable she is ? Shrikanthv (talk) 12:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - She is also the winner of Elite model look India in 2004 and a finalist of Miss India contest in 2006, which infers that the subject is notable. Lakshmikhana (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet of User:Sibtain 007. MER-C 10:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the user who is also creator of this article Lakshmikhana , may be personally involved with the subject matter may be using wikipedia as a source of advertisement(WP:NOTPROMOTION), please refer to here. also note that the claims do not have any reference proof other than one mention in a newspaper against WP:NOTNEWS.

Comment I guess User:Artistlover90 have created this article. Now it is different if both are the same, I mean sock puppets. ;) Jim Carter ^(talk) 01:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes, Jim Carter, this is my account, I used multiple accounts as they are allowed on Wikipedia. I was not intended to use it for any exploitation, if you think I have exploited so you can delete the article.Artistlover90 (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment please note that WP:SOC is not allowed and is against policy, I have note seen your contribution to any other article than the contended person and her releasing picture Shrikanthv (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I apologize for this, I am new here and had no idea about it. I was just attempting to create a page for a media personality for whom a page was not present on Wikipedia. I will learn from my mistakes and I will contribute to Wikipedia in a disciplined manner in future. Artistlover90 (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non related comment- Wait a minute please, Artistlover90 and Shrikanthv this is not the place to talk about WP:SOC. Although I think it is against our policies but since Artistlover90 is new here some concession can be given. @Artistlover90: you can't use both the accounts it is against our policy and you should only use one account to contribute here. If you continue using both accounts then I'm afraid I have to take this matter directly onto the notice of any admin which my result block of your both the accounts. So I request you to use only one account. Jim Carter ^(talk) 04:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter ^(talk) 14:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of page is seriously only involved in promoting a person and only the upcoming picture proofs here and here , have not seen any considerable other edits by the both id's also seems the sock was created much before too wiki:BLP Shrikanthv (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.