Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidhya Vijayakumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The considerable effort put toward saving this actually makes the "delete" opinions stronger, as despite that effort, no clear evidence of an NACTOR or GNG pass has been found. I would be willing to provide a user/draft-space copy with anyone who will undertake to wait to recreate this until clearer evidence of notability is available. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhya Vijayakumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears non-notable, with only small parts in movies. I find no extensive sourcing (could be some in the native language). Oaktree b (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Oaktree b (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She has been consistently appearing in malayalam movies even if its small roles. Hope to see her in a titular role soon. Badurudeen Adka (talk) 20:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Badurudeen Adka, I assume that your comment indicates a vote to "Keep" the article. Since this discussion will go on for a week, it would help your case if you continued to look for reliable sources that could help establish her notability. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I will add reliable sources as soon as possible. The Nerdy Boy (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. How is it possible that Filmography, Award and nominations section and All references of these two seperate article is same? I know that image on these two articles is different and I consider that these two person is different. Regarding Vidhya Vijayakumar article, I don't see her name here. Fade258 (talk) 12:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It has been edited and removed. Filmography has been added of Vidhya Vijayakumar. The Nerdy Boy (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded the article from the time of deletion nomination. Reliable sources have been added regarding the films. Reference links are also provided. The Nerdy Boy (talk) 21:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - She doesn't meet the criteria for WP:NACTOR due to lack of notable roles in her filmography and no in-depth coverage WP:SIGCOV. Mentioned webseries Rock Paper Scissors but no references to support notability. Can editor provide more reliable sources to prove notability? DSN18 (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Provided reliable sources regarding Rock Paper Scissors. Vidhya Vijayakumar was one of the protagonist of the web series which ran for two seasons. The Nerdy Boy (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Being an english wikipedia you need to give notable references written in english language and from reliable sources. Also the given references doesn't mention about her role in the series.~~ DSN18 (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 12:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General Comment on one point:Being an english wikipedia you need to give notable references written in english language and from reliable sources. is not completely correct. Reliable yes but not necessarily in English. The guideline makes that perfectly clear.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 03:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DSN18, Mushy Yank is correct here, there is no requirement that sources be in English or be available online either. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i agree @Liz and @Mushy Yank with your views and have striked out the comment. DSN18 (talk) 09:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.