Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin in Veil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin in Veil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost-notable band but not quite meeting any WP:BAND criteria for inclusion as far as I can tell. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:BAND criteria #4: Band has received coverage of their tours, mostly in the local language of the country (http://www.sanctuary.cz/12730-report-masquerade-virgin-veil-ve-vsetine, http://www.rumba.fi/live/eat-pussy-not-lamb-pitkaperjantai-raskaamman-livemusiikin-parissa-dubrovnikissa/, http://www.sonic-seducer.de/index.php/3290-death-rock-herbst-neue-alben-von-masquerade-und-virgin-in-veil-hier-komplett-anh http://www.cvltnation.com/cvlt-nation-interviews-virgin-veil/ etc.)

  Radio plays on France's "Attitude FM 98.3fm": http://www.attitudefm.com/podcast/frontiere-rock-speciale-deathrock-du-20-09-2016/ (Playlist: https://www.facebook.com/ReadershipHostile/posts/1599960836975749)

  WP:BAND criteria #5: Band is signed on Danse Macabre Records, a serious independant label with 20 years of existence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagrra (talk • contribs) 23 February 2017 (UTC)

  Cannot verify criterion 4, because it is not clear whether those sources are reliable or independent. Two of them appear to be blogs, one is just a directory listing, and one is an interview; none of those constitute the type of coverage we need.

  FAILS criterion 5, because they have not released 2 albums under any notable label.

  It isn't sufficient just to have radio plays; see criterion 11. They need to be played in rotation nationally. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you're right about #5, apolgies. Found this for #4 ( http://imgur.com/a/RyyZm ) a feature of the band in nationally released magazine Sonic Seducer from Germany. Contains references about their tours and releases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagrra (talk • contribs) 12:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete None of the article sources are reliable. None of the hits from google news are reliable sources. Other search tools come up empty. Delete. Tapered (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Band in nationally released magazine Sonic Seducer from Germany, article contains references about their tours and releases. ( Hoog, Karin. Sonic Seducer, November 2016, p108. Scan: http://imgur.com/a/RyyZm ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagrra (talk • contribs) 10:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.