Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virochannagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is towards the place meeting WP:GEOLAND (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 17:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Virochannagar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE. Fairly smaller neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad has 48 Wards (which denotes large neighbourhoods) in 7 Zones and Virochannagar is not in them. See Zone/Ward list. There is no reference as well since 2018. -Nizil (talk) 07:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 07:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No legal recognition to meet WP:GEOLAND nor coverage for GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep changing my vote as per updated source. Meets GEOLAND. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I have cited a source showing that this is legally recognised and has a population of over 7,000. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep recorded as a location within the official Census of India. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment — This isn't a neighbourhood, it's apparently a separate village altogether. The Ahmadabad census district handbook lists it as such, and according to the map on page 235 it's located a few kilometres outside of Ahmadabad city limits. 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 02:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.