Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visions (Cookware)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Speedy/Snow keep, per comments DGG ( talk ) 22:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Visions (Cookware)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promoting a product made by World Kitchen, LLC. Bonvallite (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a long-established and well known range of cookware, and by simply mentioning who the producer is, the article is not promoting the product. As for notability, even though the nomination doesn't even call it into question, there was a book published in 2005: The Complete Guide to Corning Ware & Visions Cookware and there's enough other coverage around, e.g. [1]. --Michig (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Michig. The article is not actively promoting anything and the subject is notable. Lepricavark (talk) 16:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, the nominator made dozens invalid deletion nominations today, demonstrating they do not understand our notability policies.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I'm the one who put the GNG template on the page, and since then several sources have been added. Having worked on the article a bit, I'm now convinced it's notable but needs more sources. I intended to change the GNG template to a refimprove but haven't done it yet. There is some promotional language that should be removed ("number one selling cookware", "most famously Corning Ware cookware", etc). Kendall-K1 (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm the creator of the page and am not affiliated with World Kitchen, nor was it my intent to promote the product. Rather, my interest was to document what I believe to be notable due to its four decades of production, innovative composition of the material used to create it, and it's numerous references in books and other media. There are pages for other kitchenware such as Pyrex for similar reasons. Jtfolden (talk) 05:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.