Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viswe–mi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Disregarding the SPA IP !vote, which states no policy-based argument, consensus is clear. BD2412 T 18:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Viswe–mi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

List of people of Viswe–mi descent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot verify that this ethnic group exists. There is not a single hit in Google or Google Books for this name.

None of the sources in List of people of Viswe–mi descent make any mention of ethnicity.

– Thjarkur (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. By the way the article creator removed the AfD template from the article and I’ve restored it. They have added two alleged sources that are unsearchable and frankly look ridiculous. The same editor created List of people of Viswe–mi descent from which they also removed the AfD template. This has four sources, none of which mentions the term ‘Visme-mi’. I’ve tried searching possible variants (vishwe mi, viswe naga) and found nothing. The new editor who created this has already had a block for sockpuppetry and a string of creations deleted. Mccapra (talk) 06:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both Irrespective of the creator's past brush with wikilaw, this appears to be an honest misunderstanding. In South Asia anyone who lives in a certain place is ethnically called by that place name with an added I. Pakistan-->Pakistani, Hindustan-->Hindustani, America-->Amriki, so on and so forth. These are people living in Viswema, so they will undoubtedly be called Viswemi, but they are such a small minority that no one has cared to write anything about them. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both per all of the above Spiderone 11:51, 5 May 2020 (UTCT)
• keep let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. We shouldn't be deleting whole pages on ethnic groups. This page can certainly be improved.80.7.57.141 (talk) 08:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Certainly this page can be improved, let's not move to the point where we are deleting pages on ethnic groups we're not familiar with. Abstrakt (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that this page can be improved, since there are no reliable sources to verify that this ethnic group exists let alone is notable Spiderone 14:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.