Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vox Solid Communications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 04:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vox Solid Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable and considerably promotional. This is a local publicity organization limited to Las Vegas with local references only. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The unabashedly promotional text is a content issue that can be fixed. Most coverage is WP:LOCAL but a long profile in Working Mother magazine is undoubtedly "significant coverage in independent reliable sources" and therefore this passes WP:GNG.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep The sourcing is thin, and I couldn't find additional sources in a quick search - but the interview with Working Mother, a national magazine, goes a long way toward establishing notability. I don't find the article to be unacceptably promotional. --MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.