Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vurb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Snap Inc.. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vurb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The main reason as I see it for ghits for this 'mobile search engine' seems to be that Snapchat might be taking, are taking, or have taken them over. What "enables people to find, plan, and share by connecting them to the most relevant information and tools from apps and services in a single experience" means, I am not sure. They probably do it. But are they notable? Or should the article be improved by someone who can see more in it than I can? Peridon (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vurb, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.