Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W21DA-D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

W21DA-D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another short-lived, now-defunct HC2/Innovate LPTV with no local content, almost no operational history (the periods of silence seemed to eat up most of the time it was licensed), and undoubtedly no significant coverage (or any, really) to satisfy the GNG. (Surprisingly, this article was not part of that failed bulk AfD, which included numerous stations much like this one, from earlier this year.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Georgia (U.S. state). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable waste of the public bandwidth, transmitter crews and the FCC's time. Nate • (chatter) 21:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.