Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W3Schools (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

W3Schools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination by IP 209.82.165.136:

W3Schools should be deleted because it has no rep. refs. SN54129 17:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an excerpt of some books used in a previous AfD in 2016 (In which all the !votes were keep). All these books are still there, and there are now lots more. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W3Schools (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.