Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WDNZ-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to WNKY. asilvering (talk) 01:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WDNZ-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More OR slop from User:K-Johnson 127; non-notable LPTV. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kentucky. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into WNKY. It’s a non-notable LPTV that’s better off going the way of WLHA-LD or KCWL-LD at best. (I copy&pasted this but it still works) --Danubeball

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge Sources do not establish notability. Also nashvilledtvnews.info is a user generated content site. I question all the other places it is used on WP

Czarking0 (talk) 06:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge infobox and channel map, and technical details to WNKY Station existed as a license only by companies with no interest in actually broadcasting until 2019, when outside a little-watched 'TV on radio' simulcast that probably didn't even have WKCT as a viewer itself and someone plugging in the newspaper's daily YouTube video playlist into VLC to provide local news, it just carried a 'bouncing ball' mix of Antenna/MyNet and Biz TV content as a 'run for fun' station until Marquee bought it, professionalized it and programmed it as a WNKY extension. Not really a lot here and just a lot of fat (especially the details about WHAS 'interference', which if you know the rules of LPTV, it has to accept that interference no matter what anyways, and more care about Antenna TV's fate in the market than should be spent by an average person). A section about the technical details of WNKY-LD and WDNZ-LD is appropriate, but in a much reduced form. Nathannah • 📮 20:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.