Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WEBU-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WEBU-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as a diginet pass-through. Most recent edits were by User:Whcq, which proves WP:COI. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Many of the same (GNG and COI) issues with the articles for co-owned WPRQ-LD and WHCQ-LD apply here too. (Indeed, "most recent edits" is a bit of an understatement — other than my addition of categories formerly on the WEBU-LP redirect, and a few maintenance revisions, all the substantial contributions are by Whcq (talk · contribs).) There is a license history going back to 1988 here, but that doesn't mean much without sufficient sourcing to verify anything beyond existence, much less notability. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.