Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WISHES

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WISHES

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived, seemingly defunct educational initative, written like an advert (tagged) that also fails WP:GNG. My BEFORE failed to show that this has significance (few mentionsions in passing is about all I can see). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Europe. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on an Erasmus portal project, with the appearance of originating in a presentation, complete with a "Next steps" section. Looking at Wayback, I can see summarisation of the original 2008-11 funded project on a participant site [1]; the portal appears to have ceased sometime in 2014, with its former web address subsequently repurposed. I am not seeing evidence that it attained notability during its lifespan. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.