Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WISeKey
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
WISeKey
- WISeKey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is large copy-and-pasted from the company's own website, and it basically reads like an advertisement. It does not appear to establish why the company is notable. A look at the edit history indicates that it may have been largely created by someone with a connection to the company's CEO. A search of Google News does turn up several results, but they all look like puffery to me and not references that would establish this as a notable corporation. Shritwod (talk) 14:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari Hangout 16:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari Hangout 16:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 15:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 15:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, a promo piece cited to the company website. Kierzek (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as advertising of a non-notable company. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete No sources. Mirror360 (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- [Revert as per WP:BLOCKEVASION using strikethrough font. 22:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.