Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WORLDwrite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WORLDwrite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

SPA. Poor article. Effectively completely unreferenced. Fails the most basic GNG Rayman60 (talk) 10:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRITE or WP:CORPDEPTH; therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I looked for better sourcing, and was thinking about !voting keep, since there were a lot of hits from 'Spiked' magazine. Then I found this, which does seem to be a decent piece of journalism - but one of the things it flags up is that Spiked was set up by people who were directly involved with Worldwrite, so their articles wouldn't be independent sources. That makes the Hackney Gazette piece the only good source I can find about them - and we require multiple such sources to establish notability per WP:NCORP. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:40, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.