Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WPRQ-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 12:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WPRQ-LD

WPRQ-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested redirect - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 11:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: A station largely serving as a pass-through for national programming probably won't get over the GNG hump. Any merger into a single Ellington Broadcasting article probably wouldn't fix that — and it certainly would not rectify the COI issues the stations' articles have — the original creator back in 2007 was Dellington (talk · contribs) (and that original revision noted David Ellington as the station owner), and a key contributor in recent years has been Whcq (talk · contribs) — when one of the stations is, indeed, WHCQ-LD. WCQuidditch 01:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Obvious GNG fail. Diginet coatrack. The only appropriate ATD would be a redirect to list. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WPRQ-LD, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.