Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WPVC-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. The nominator has !voted to keep and requested the nomination to be closed. (non-admin closure) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 16:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WPVC-LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Seriously? It has 10(!) references, some local. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 15:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: It should be noted that the nominator mass AFD'd multiple station pages, with the same rationale, from 22:07 to 23:17 UTC yesterday. No apparent effort was made by the nominator to improve the articles prior to nomination. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 15:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per request. I overlooked, and so I request that this AfD is closed as "keep the article".

  Chuterix (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  In addition, most defunct LPFMs were religious programs, which get zero attention by just about any secondary source. Most community radio stations only have a few secondary sources mentioning the opening of the station and/or one of its staff members (e.g. WP:Articles for deletion/KYOM-LP). There's however no information about the founding of WPVC-LP, though, so I'll leave it there. Chuterix (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.