Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WXDB-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. per "Keep" consensus and coverage beyond technical details. (non-admin closure) Cinder painter (talk) 14:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXDB-LP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I disagree with the contention about "only technical information". There was substantial internal turmoil that killed this station within two months (!), but it led to a writeup in the Charleston newspaper, which is cited. This is probably a borderline case because of how short-lived it was, but those two refs of coverage amount to more than most of the LPFMs up for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: For an completely incorrect nomination reason to start. The article has 2 seperate sources from a local newspaper and a local philanthropic organization. Nominator clearly did not check this article (along with others) before nominating or else they wouldn't have made such an egregious error. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.