Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WYDD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to WPGB. Kurykh (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WYDD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one article, that exists in the dab page. The other page is a red link and I think that isn't notable enough. Also there is no evidence that the acronym represents the mentioned pages. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore 11-year-old redirect to WPGB. The station had the call sign "WYDD" for 22 years, so this is an entirely reasonable redirect. When/if WYDD-LP gets an article, a hatnote can be added to WPGB; a dab page isn't needed. — Gorthian (talk) 23:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to WPGB. Current low-power station has no evidence of notability, but 22-year history of prior use makes it a plausible search term for current WPGB. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.