Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walden's Path

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While not stated directly, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES is a factor within this discussion regarding the article. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Walden's Path (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't verify that this school meets WP:GNG. No indication of significant independent coverage. The listed reference doesn't mention the school. User:Decegama and User:Dr. Angel DeCegama seem to have a COI with this and other entries, as DeCegama is listed as on the core team of Catalyzer Startup Accelerator, which is promoting the school. EricEnfermero (Talk) 16:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The school's admissions page indicates that it is a K–10 school. Editors have argued on both sides whether this counts as a secondary school. • Gene93k (talk) 21:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Yes, it's a secondary school which educates to 16, which is school-leaving age in many countries. Kept by longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Other than a single self-sourced web page, how can we be certain this school even exists? Jacona (talk) 23:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Honestly, I made this nomination after forgetting about the possibility of presumed notability for secondary schools. I do notice that the magnet school (the grades 1-10 school) won't operate until the 2016 school year and won't even accept applications for admission for several more months. Is that a consideration? EricEnfermero (Talk) 00:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I have verified the existence of this school and they introducing Artful Learning. As an Educationist, I was curious to know why no other school has introduced this model in India. I have also created Artful Learning page on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramyakr (talk • contribs) 13:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Necro.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  06:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.