Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkover Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Walkover Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

highest degree of promotions. Written by company influenced individual. Does not provide an ounce of notability for Encyclopedia material. Few media sources are not enough to make anything encyclopedia material. where such companies are known by their customers or relative people. There are no nation or international notability is established. One of the thousands companies in India. It is not a Bloomberg directory. Light2021 (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this in fact is quite speedy material, with it never caring to go beyond advertising its company and services, and that's not surprising because it's been damned like it since starting last year; with such blatancy, this should've been nominated sooner and I know I would've had I found it sooner; listed contents are entirely trivial as is to be expected with such advertising, therefore there's nothing else to honestly say. SwisterTwister talk 03:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. Wikipedia is not a client prospectus / product brochure. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails on most counts, non notable, promotional etc. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 08:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note Company official requested for reconsideration. Clear case of violating COI. As mentioned there and being clear that this article is written by none other than company itself. Second Point to be noted as Company is promoting themselves with Red-Herring Award. It is listed Spam and Blocked by Wikipedia for such achievements. Light2021 (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Light2021:Can you please clarify?Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ARUNEEK: Please see for example this message: Deletion of Walkover Technologies on my Talk page. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It simply fails WP:NCORP. There is not even a single independent reliable source about this company. Anup [Talk] 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP.No independent reliable source that covers this company.Further,WIKIPEDIA is not a sort of brochure for a company!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.