Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkwalkwalk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Walkwalkwalk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could find nothing in gnews (also searched under "walk walk walk"). Most of the sources provided are primary. Sources 9-12 merely confirm they were exhibited. Fails GNG LibStar (talk) 04:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and England. LibStar (talk) 04:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a book reference https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/Walking_Networks/cuXaDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Walkwalkwalk%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA74&printsec=frontcover - I'll add it to the article later today. Newystats (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there is the book ref I've found as a secondary source and though the are primary, the three Heddon and Turner scholarly papers doi:10.1080/10486801.2012.666741, doi:10.1080/13528165.2010.539873 and doi:10.1080/13528165.2010.539873 are independent. Newystats (talk) 06:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have updated further references from a few different fields, which should help establish notability. The article could still use some clean and expansion, but I have made it so most of the references are from scholarly literature, rather than self cited. Genericxz (talk) 16:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess newly added sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per added sources since the nomination and the fact that Walking art is a real thing and this is a prominent example. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.