Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warduke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warduke

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional character. Clearly a recurring feature in lots of D&D media, but no evidence of real-world notability and no secondary sources cited. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Dungeons & Dragons (TV series). BOZ (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The character's only claim to fame was the number of appearances he has made in various official D&D products, but without reliable, secondary sources discussing him, he just does not pass the WP:GNG. Searching for sources brings up a few mentions here and there, but nothing in-depth, or going much beyond just mentioning products he appears in. Rorshacma (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG, belongs at https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Warduke or like. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article basically only says that the character exists, which is insufficient for a stand-alone article. – sgeureka ^t•c 21:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.