Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water management hierarchy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Water management hierarchy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept and theory of these articles together seems to be promoted and discussed only by the original authors (Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi, Zainuddin Abdul Manan); eg, [1] and [2] have these authors too. They seem to publish together. Google, scholar and news searches for all three article titles turn up no independent sources or news. It seems like COI self-promoting research by Sharifah81 (talk · contribs) (read: one of the author names is Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi). Darcyisverycute (talk) 08:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Darcyisverycute (talk) 08:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note I am nominating the following related pages because they are written by the same user in the same topic of water conservation, all cite the aforementioned two authors, all link to each other, and I could not find independent sources for them:

Cost-effective minimum water network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Systematic hierarchical approach for resilient process screening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Darcyisverycute (talk) 08:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all three due to lack of independent coverage. Cortador (talk) 09:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom JM (talk) 15:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - per nom. Perhaps Water pinch analysis (created by the same author) could also be considered for deletion. Sgubaldo (talk) 18:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I did have a look at it, but I think sufficient independent research of that topic exists to establish separate notability - in that article currently, only 3 of the 6 citations have Manan and Alwi listed, and the other 3 are all independent (sources 1, 3, and 6). It could certainly use non-technical descriptions though. Darcyisverycute (talk) 19:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.