Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wavestone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wavestone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent references and no claim of notability in the article. I don't see enough coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH even considering references to Solucom. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I have some citations for notability, but they don't really fit in the stub as it exists now. Wavestone is listed on the Forbes list of the best management consulting firms for 2018. It is listed third on the Glassdoor list of best companies to work for in France for 2018. It hit over 350 million EUR in annual revenue, and continues to grow in revenue and headcount. Obviously, more of the coverage of the firm is in French. More content and citations could be taken from the French version of this article and from French sources. But I believe the subject is notable. Jbbdude (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 03:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate and references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. References are either based on company announcements or interviews with company sources or connected companies. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom and HighKing. The issue is independent sourcing. Right now, there isn't enough to meet either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.