Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We fly again

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We fly again

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded with a rationale on the article's talk page. Searches turned up virtually nothing to show it passes WP:GNG, and it clearly does not pass WP:NFILM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This project was presented in over 10 film festivals around the world and a people want to know more about the movie and future awards that will receive being in the international film circuit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladxela (talk • contribs) 14:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It also available for renting on amazon here https://www.amazon.com/We-Fly-Again-Denise-Black/dp/B06W2KVHTN Vladxela (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC). If Amazon is not an important and reliable source then IDK what to say anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladxela (talk • contribs) 14:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here you can have a director statement about the movie in one of the most important documentary film festivals from Spain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Lsn5CXFrg&t=4s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladxela (talk • contribs) 14:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notability as evidenced by no significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Amazon does not qualify as a source because it is only selling a product. They sell a wide range of films that can be either notable or not notable by Wikipedia's standards. Sources need to be at least one step removed from the topic, such as reviewing the film or reporting about activity related to it as part of their usual coverage. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 22:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - like Alexandru Vlad (film director), this is a promotional page with very little substance, and no indication through independent sources of meeting WP:NFILM. - Biruitorul ^Talk 00:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't researched this enough to form an opinion, but I do note the similarity between the director's name, Alexandru Vlad and the username User:Vladxela. Autobiographical promotion, perhaps? -- RoySmith (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.