Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wearable Computing Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wearable Computing Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Research groups are not normally notable and this one does not seem to be particularly distinguished among wearable tech groups. Tagged for notability since 2008. Mccapra (talk) 08:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or, if someone wants to make an article on Zary Segall (note spelling), redirect there. As an Endowed Chair Professor at KTH and former distinguished professor at UMBC, Segall is notable. His old research group at his older employer is not. The mention in the Smart Mobs book is trivial, and it's the only source, so this does not pass WP:GNG. And the longevity of the foundational misspelling of Segall's name casts a lot of doubt on the need for this article. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all the above. It's a long way uphill for an individual research group to be notable, and there's no indication that this is an exception. I'm also a bit dubious about Wearable augmented task-list interchange device. XOR'easter (talk) 19:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.