Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web App Generator for Enterprise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Web App Generator for Enterprise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Notability (software). No WP:GHITS except for this and one other Wikipedia page edited by the same author, for either "Web App Generator for Enterprise" or "Web App Generator Enterprise". —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the general caveats over using Google hits, but for a piece of software, of course, if there were sources one would expectthem predominately to be online ones. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Potential G11 article, furthermore, dependent on a non-existent article: "Web App Generator for Enterprise is an enterprise edition of the WAG Web App Generator SaaS platform." {_C A S U K I T E ^T} 15:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Tried looking for sources, none of which point to the subject, if at all. Fails WP:NSOFT. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 06:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, even if one adds "for Enterprise" at the end of the name. It might be possible some day to do a combined article on the company which appears to be Software Progressions Corporation in Walnut Creek, California. But even then not sure how many independent sources one would find; some companies make it hard to determine how big they really are. W Nowicki (talk) 22:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.