Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webaholic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Webaholic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing more than extended vanity spam from Sourav Saha. Searching webaholic gives exactly 0 sources which have independent coverage and I see no claims of notability either at this point. Praxidicae (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete No credible claim of notability, and the only relevant news article(out of 8 in total) for the word "Webaholic", is from a site affiliated to the company. The article creator has also created articles about the founder, the second owner as well, both of whom seem to be non-notable themselves, could be a case of WP:UPE Daiyusha (talk) 11:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Article is a puff piece with puff piece sourcing.TH1980 (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as likely paid-for spam. I've blocked the creator for UPE. MER-C 04:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Native advertising with a brochure article. scope_creep^Talk 10:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:GNG. A redirect to Internet addiction disorder could be made. Bearian (talk) 18:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.