Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weiss/Manfredi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weiss/Manfredi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had actually speedied this (but it was removed by Brianhe) as my searches simply found nothing better than some passing mentions from business publications, hardly much for obvious better notability and improvement. Notifying past tagger Diannaa in case she has any comments and I'm sure Brianhe is watching anyway so I won't notify him. SwisterTwister talk 08:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 09:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 09:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 09:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 09:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: references seem sufficient to me. – Brianhe (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.