Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werel (Alterra) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Planets of the Hainish Cycle. Sandstein 18:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Werel (Alterra)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much has changed since the last nomination in 2014. This is still a hodgepodge of plot summary and OR. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The planet needs an entry. Why not improve rather than destroying?--GwydionM (talk) 08:29, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Planets of the Hainish Cycle. Unclear if that article is notable either, but that seems like the best current option._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (and redirect to maintain the edit history) to Planets of the Hainish Cycle. Create a Werel redirect too. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Planets of the Hainish Cycle, as the relevant notable topic. Newimpartial (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect. @GwydionM: There is enough encyclopedic content about this planet that it needs to be covered somewhere; but there isn't enough that a standalone article is really necessary. The number of Hainish Cycle planets which have any coverage in secondary sources is small. All the necessary information can be covered at Planets of the Hainish Cycle; the only exception is Gethen. Vanamonde (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.