Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weyr (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weyr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as pure fancruft and move Weyr (disambiguation) to base._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Terrible WP:FANCRUFT that fortunately survives in https://pern.fandom.com/wiki/Weyrs so nothing is lost. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fictional, usual-variety fancruft. Pure PLOT. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.