Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whataboutery in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Whataboutism. Since some of the delete voters are suggesting a possible selective merge, I'm going to close as redirect to WP:PRESERVE the content in case anyone finds it useful to merge, per WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 01:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whataboutery in India

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is way too specific for an article, and Whataboutery is not specific to India. I, however, do not support a merge with Whataboutism.
This article also seems to be taking a jab at the Indian "Narendra Modi" government and some right-wing political parties. dibbydib ^boop or _snoop 00:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. dibbydib ^boop or _snoop 00:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge any worthwhile content into the main page on whataboutism. This is not unique to India, nor does it seem unusually prevalent.As such its hard to see why we need a separate article.Slatersteven (talk) 06:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can’t say I disagree with the content of the article, but it’s still a POV fork that has no reason to exist. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What about the whatabouttery in other countries eh? This article doesn't talk about that! (This means I think this is a WP:POVFORK BTW). FOARP (talk) 07:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't - this is a geographical "fork", which in itself is fine. Please read policies before citing them. Johnbod (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. I have no idea why it was done separately from the main article Whataboutery, . The nom in saying we should not merge seems to be saying we should discuss this as it applies everywhere except in India. I do not follow Indian politics, but if the content is onesided in some political fashion, additional content can be added. DGG ( talk ) 18:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. per DGG. Johnbod (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm sure you can get examples of whataboutery (or indeed any kind of logical fallacy) in any country in the world, that does not mean you should have an article about on any specific country. Country-specific examples of whataboutery is not a notable subject by itself unless it can be shown that it is something widely discussed. There is also an element of original research as well as POV issues for any entry. A line or two can be added to the main article whataboutism for specific examples discussed as cases of whataboutery (but frankly, the inclusion of many of the entries in "Whataboutism" are excessive), but merging the article is pointless. Hzh (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing to see in this original research. 27.57.173.221 (talk) 12:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.