Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitix (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whitix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable computer operating system that does not pass the WP:GNG. None of the sources included in the article are viable, largely just being links to the creator's long dead website, and searches brought up no coverage at all in reliable sources. It seems to have already been deleted once via AFD way back in 2005 (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitix), but was re-created several years later and has sat here ever since. It could potentially be speeded under criteria G4, but since I have no way of knowing if this version is, in fact, sufficiently identical to the deleted version, I figured I should bring it here instead. Rorshacma (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:26, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Sounds like a cool project that seems to have faded out. No evidence of notability now or in the past.Thparkth (talk) 03:19, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- I also could not find any coverage at all, let alone WP:SIGCOV. The fact that the project was essentially abandoned in 2009 suggests there won't be any forthcoming. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.